13 Yrs♥F✓#
Ironically, I thought of that a month ago and already have a solution. I'm using Chrome on windows and everything is still fitting so I'm going to guess it's Safari. But Either way, I'll update for more room.
Edit: Interesting... Looks like chromium based. I don't have that issue.
12 Yrs♥F$✓#
knew I should have included my browser - I'm using Opera on Win7 at 1080... if that helps
typically it's the same as Chrome though =)
9 Yrs♥$✓#
I don't have an issue using Firefox 76 in Windows 10. This is what it looks like on my end. All the emblems fit nicely under abatage's avatar.
9 Yrs♥✓#
Eries
9 Yrs♥✓#
I´m using Opera as well, but you look normal to me. At least on Win10 at 4k.
13 Yrs♥F✓#
Should be good now. And allow for 10 Yrs.
12 Yrs♥F$✓#
hmmm interesting... maybe it's just one of those "me" things...
I also tried it on my phone for comparison - loaded the desktop site using Opera mobile and still got the same (off-centre) layout
if it helps my phone is 1440p, but I don't think it would be a resolution thing anyway
12 Yrs♥F$✓#
haha yep it looks fine again =)
another niggle bites the dust - thanks
edit: looks like you added 10px to the overall width - it must just be one of those weird things where margins/etc render differently in certain scenarios - used to drive me crazy when I worked on web sites.. thanks again.. always a pleasure!
13 Yrs♥F✓#
This has been fixed too!
6 Yrs♥✓#
Son_of_a_Pitch
6 Yrs♥✓#
I was wondering if we should or could add the little replay symbol to the games on the recently completed list on our front pages?
6 Yrs♥$✓#
I'm not sure Everdred has actually commented on this directly but it was suggested recently. It's the sort of feature that is sometimes unannounced/uncommented on until it's implemented.
10 Yrs♥$✓#
uvehj
10 Yrs♥$✓#
Post preview and editing is breaks "\". Since you need to write 2 (one to escape the second) while previewing or editing a post the first "\" disappears and you need to go back and add it back each time you preview the post. Same with editing, you need to remember to add back a second "\" for each of them or they won't be escaped and they won't appear in the post.
13 Yrs♥F✓#
Should be fixed now.
10 Yrs♥$✓#
uvehj10 Yrs♥$✓#
Thanks for the quick fix!
I've tested it a bit and it seems to be working right :)
10 Yrs♥$✓#
uvehj10 Yrs♥$✓#
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
13 Yrs♥F✓#
I'm sorry to destroy your business model but things were getting out of hand.
9 Yrs♥✓#
Everdred is the Progressive candidate we need to stamp out unfettered capitalism.
13 Yrs♥F✓#
I'm working on new admin tools for blocking PMs right now.
10 Yrs♥✓#
Yeah the way he was in the forums I expected way more than that. Something to be thankful for I guess. The dumb thing is I totally get where he's coming from, and if it weren't so much extra effort for such minimal gain I think it could be useful to be able to see the base and GOTY main game times collated. It's a shame he couldn't get his head around that or the arguments against his position.
On topic, someone mentioned having a toggle for letting all/only friends/nobody send you PMs, which I think would be an elegant solution as well as or instead of a block button
13 Yrs♥F✓#
That's what's unfortunate. There are things we could discuss on improvements but he got so hostile. Also, creating multiple unnecessary threads.
13 Yrs♥F✓#
I've cleaned up this thread, not to hide anything but to keep it on track.
To sum it up, chez_blunts was banned for abusive behavior.
To sum it up, chez_blunts was banned for abusive behavior.
13 Yrs♥F✓#
Site Update
Private Message Control:
- PMs now match your profile privacy - Everyone/Friends/Private
- - - Your privacy option must be the equivalent of the person you are PMing otherwise you will be denied.
- - - Existing conversations can continue regardless of your privacy options. Use "Delete PMs" to leave the conversation and fall back to privacy rules.
- I now have the ability to revoke all PM permissions from a single user
Private Message Control:
- PMs now match your profile privacy - Everyone/Friends/Private
- - - Your privacy option must be the equivalent of the person you are PMing otherwise you will be denied.
- - - Existing conversations can continue regardless of your privacy options. Use "Delete PMs" to leave the conversation and fall back to privacy rules.
- I now have the ability to revoke all PM permissions from a single user
9 Yrs♥✓#
Are deleted PMs deleted for both users? I'm just wondering if the second feature could let a private user PM other users without letting them reply back. Seems easily exploited by bad actors if so.
13 Yrs♥F✓#
No, conversations are only deleted locally. It allows you to stop the conversation whenever you'd like.
Obviously a per person block would be nice, but that's not there yet.
9 Yrs♥✓#
None of these options would immediately stop me from PMing someone set to friends-only (provided we're friends), would it? I have an open conversation with a friends-only user and don't want to suggest you make a change that forces up to stop chatting.
I do wonder if we have any Private users who do use PMs? Hopefully they speak up so we can get both sides.
13 Yrs♥F✓#
EDIT: That's actually a lie. The privacy stuff is lifted directly from profile privacy. Private means no one, friends means friends, public means everyone.
The only difference here is that it opens up PMs to be viewable when someone more locked down sends a message to a open person.